🔗 Share this article

The future president of the prestigious debating society has been removed from his position after failing a vote of confidence that came after his controversial social media posts about the conservative activist.

The vote against the student leader achieved the necessary super-majority to remove him from office, according to an announcement from the society.

Disputed Comments

The controversy erupted after Mr Abaraonye reportedly shared messages on online platforms that appeared to welcome the death of Charlie Kirk, who was shot dead while addressing a college in Utah.

According to reports, one social media message reportedly read "Charlie Kirk got shot loool" - using an extended form of the phrase 'lol'.

The student leader is also reported to have posted in a messaging group with other members appearing to express approval of the event.

Election Results

The no-confidence motion was conducted over the weekend, with outcomes revealed on this week.

Official notices showed that over twelve hundred votes were cast in favor of removal, while 501 were opposed the motion.

The announcement stated that the president-elect was deemed to have stepped down in accordance with the Oxford Union's rules.

Procedural Disputes

Proceedings were temporarily halted early on Monday after the election official was allegedly subjected to "interference, threats, and inappropriate behavior" from several representatives.

In a response, the student claimed that the vote tally had been halted because election administrators believed "no legitimate and true result could be reached as a result of procedural failures".

His statement unequivocally denied that any person acting for George had engaged in intimidating or disruptive behavior.

Continuing Controversy

The president-elect maintained that extremely serious issues had been referred to the governing body and that he remained the elected leader.

His statement added that he was "proud and thankful to have the backing of significantly more than half of students at Oxford" who supported a "safe election and resist attempts to subvert democracy".

Opponents have said that any failure to remove him would "demonstrate internationally that the Oxford Union has prioritized politics over principles".

External Responses

On Friday, Mikey McCoy presented an open letter to the society on a related program podcast.

The letter accused the society of becoming a institution where "student leaders publicly celebrate the killing of a political opponent".

The statement indicated that if Mr Abaraonye were to remain in post, Kirk's allies would "directly reach out to every U.S. political figure who has ever graced the union's chamber and advise them against future participation".

The Oxford Union had earlier condemned Mr Abaraonye's comments after Kirk's death and stated that complaints submitted about him had been forwarded for disciplinary proceedings.

The student leader had been one of several students to debate with the activist at the society in May.