🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized professional network test this week following viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."